Replies to Interactive Comments AMT2013-336 “Daytime stratospheric NO2 retrievals” Authors’ response to Anonymous Referee #1
ثبت نشده
چکیده
(1) An important point is the large bias (30-50%) between OMI (KNMI DOMINO v2.0) and SCIAMACHY nadir (KNMI-BIRA TM4NO2A v2.3) retrievals, especially if both data sets are photochemically converted. It is puzzling me because Dirksen et al. (2011) and Hendrick et al. (2012) found a good agreement between OMI, SCIAMACHY nadir and groundbased observations, suggesting the absence of such a large bias between OMI and SCIAMACHY. Can this feature be attributed to the change in the OMI version (DOMINO v0.8 in Dirksen et al. (2011) and DOMINO v2.0 in the present study) ?
منابع مشابه
Interactive comment on “Stratospheric and tropospheric SSU/MSU temperature trends and compared to reanalyses and IPCC CMIP5 simulations in 1979–2005” by A. M. Powell Jr. et al
Interactive comment on “Stratospheric and tropospheric SSU/MSU temperature trends and compared to reanalyses and IPCC CMIP5 simulations in 1979–2005” by A. M. Powell Jr. et al. Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 13 February 2013 General comments: This paper shows that the selected CMIP5 models consistently capture such important climate features as the stratospheric cooling trend due ...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “Case studies of particle formation events observed in boreal forests: implications for nucleation mechanisms” by F. Yu and R. Turco
The authors thank the referee for the constructive and helpful comments. Our detailed replies to the referee 2’s comments (in Italic) are given below. Anonymous Referee 2 This manuscript discusses an important topic, the contribution of ion-induced nucleation on atmospheric new particle formation. It is well-written, and in its current form, discreet, compared to the original manuscript. It is ...
متن کاملInteractive comment on “Nitrate removal in a restored riparian groundwater system: functioning and importance of individual riparian zones” by S. Peter et al
Author’s response to Referees comments First, we would like to thank the two anonymous Referees for their positive and constructive reviews. Anonymous Referee #1 Referee 1: This was an easy paper to review. The study design was good and the authors provide multiple corroborating lines of data to support their conclusions. The paper is well written. I have only a few suggested changes to the tex...
متن کاملIntercomparison of daytime stratospheric NO2 satellite retrievals and model simulations
This paper evaluates the agreement between stratospheric NO2 retrievals from infrared limb sounders (Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) and High Resolution Dynamics Limb Sounder (HIRDLS)) and solar UV/VIS backscatter sensors (Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Cartography (SCIAMACHY) limb and nadir) over the...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014